For the final day of anniversary celebrations, we asked a few questions of Jaka “lynx” Kranjc. He is the current project maintainer, long time release manager, experimental modder and IESDP steward.
1. How did you find your way into GemRB?
I’m pretty sure I first learned about the project from the The Linux Game Tome (HappyPenguin) release news website. I kept following the project and its occasional releases and at one point in late 2007 it just became clear that progress is too slow and that I can do something about it as a forester. I compiled GemRB, ran it and immediately saw bugs in BG2 character generation. Popping on IRC, some were fixed as soon as they were reported, but as I started providing patches, it didn’t take long for Avenger to grant me commit access and not have to bother with manually applying them.
2. Was it hard to get other people interested to contribute? How helpful were platforms like SourceForge, FLOSS communities of the time and the game fanbase?
Projects like this have a nearly endless stream of interesting problems to solve, from fixing bugs, enhancing original behaviour, reverse engineering, code review and refactoring … to less technical ones like maintaining project infrastructure, community engagement, testing, research, promotion, modding and more (check your fit here).
And all these tasks and roles attract different people at different stages. I think the most common motivation is still to scratch your own itch (do what you want), but it also helps when more people are active, since there are synergistic effects. And lively projects appear healthier and sexier, so that helps with attracting new talent. At times we are searching for particular skills and setups, but there’s no easy way to just get it. As cool as the games are, even the wider community is a bit of a niche one and it’s unlikely that technological problems themselves will be enough to attract people (though that has happened as well).
So it’s very important to be transparent and develop in the open, in a way let the project speak for itself. Having access to “cost free” infrastructure like SourceForge, GitHub, Travis, AppVeyor, Coverity, Sonar etc. is very valuable in the sense of productivity, but also in ensuring consistent project availability. Lowering the bar for entry has always helped us get more contributors, be it through better tooling (eg. revision control), documentation or clarity of needs. Which is all crucial if you want to convince people to volunteer some time for a crazy project like this.
The game fan bases can’t be underestimated either. What a resilient and curious bunch of people! :) To this day they continue to torture the games and themselves, trying to answer obscure questions about engine behaviour. Without that continuous thirst for knowledge and willingness to share it, we’d have a much harder time developing GemRB.
3. For you, was reverse engineering more a thing of testing the games or looking at the disassembly? What tools and tactics did you use, especially considering there are 8 major versions of the IE engine out there?
It’s definitely more about playtesting, when needed, as I don’t really read assembly. There’s usually a wizard around that can answer such questions. For many things neither is needed though, especially if you played some of these games more times than you’re willing to admit. Yep.
As far as tools go, the
existing modding tools are of great help when exploring and deciding what’s a
data bug and what’s ours. Plain old “strings” can be used to check if something
was hardcoded in the original EXEs. I upgrade
iesh as needed to support more formats; this
tool is great for answering questions like “Is this field/bit unused?”, since
you can script it to check all files in all games. Using it or ielister to
pretty-print binary files is also very useful. For one to enable a readable
log for the unhardcoded binary data that we ship, but also to compare savegames
between the engines, which is important for compatibility.
4. Was there any help or obstruction from official developers at any point?
I don’t know of any obstruction, though one could say we had a case of “stealing developers” with the release of the enhanced editions. But not really. They released a few file format headers, which helped confirm some reverse-engineered guesses and provided other info, as in a sense, everyone was seeing the code for the first time.
Looking forward, the fact that they copied some of our designs will inadvertently enable us to provide compatibility more easily. More importantly, reviving the broader community and general interest is probably the single most important contribution.
5. Do you remember some contributions that you’re really proud of? Or a problem that was especially infuriating to solve?
There have been many exciting moments in the project. For example when we made Planescape: Torment completable for the first time in 2016. Or when the 10-player party mod was good enough (a perl monster). Or this new website. I’ve also removed a lot of duplicated code — GitHub stats state that in all these years I’ve still removed more code than added (23k lines left to equalize).
In the rare case I find something infuriating, I avoid it or pause for a while. It has worked so far, but I’m not easily riled up.
6. Do you remember any amusing anecdotes, discoveries or original engine quirks? What’s the worst hack or most silly design that you encountered?
At least one of the GUI data files uses one of the Windows 95 desktop wallpapers as a background. The originals are littered with hacks and quirks and unfortunately we have to copy many of them in some way. Cursing and eye-rolling are not that rare, especially when you see they invented something new, badly, while there was already a good mechanism of achieving the same.
Once I wrote a limerick in a commit message, asking for help. A new contributor joined soon after and did much more than was asked for. Appears serendipitous, but surely just a thing of chance.
If we weren’t stuck with the game data, I’d retroactively change the scripting design to have linear execution, so successful trigger evaluation is immediately followed by the execution of their action block. Probably would end up just using Python directly. For all the other features that would bring and to make the experience more like reading books and other programming languages.
7. Which one was your favourite IE game and do you still play it? Or other old games? Or contribute to other reverse-engineering/reimplementation projects?
I started with BG2 and most often played that. But I really like the story and elegance of IWD2, not to mention the mind-boggling PST. I’m hard pressed to choose an overall winner. I still play them for testing now and then, sometimes at a properly non-rushed pace. Having worked on their implementation made me appreciate them in new lights, eg. even the bag of hacks that is PST has done some things better than all the games that came after it.
Other older games … I’m trying various RPG classics now and then, but the only other game I’ve replayed several times is a strategy mix: Jagged Alliance 2. It was later poorly open-sourced and the proper continuation of the improvement and porting efforts resulted in the Jagged Alliance 2 Stracciatella project. I mostly do code review there and help steer it; GemRB and the Infinity engine remain my main passion.
8. What’s on the GemRB feature/tech plan for the future?
Brad talked about the major plans in a separate article, but personally I’d like to get the time to work more on IWD2. It’s already a surprisingly polished experience, but the game remains unfinishable after a few chapters. And it’s our last original game to be conquered! However, the subviews branch needs to be finished, so I have to help with that first.
I also have an old stash of the beginning of a combat code refactor, since the originals used quite an exotic way to figure out round timing (a picture), which we don’t support yet. Externalizing more of the combat logic is also important for anyone else that may want to use the engine.
At some point we’ll also have to clean up our character animation subsystem. It’s my least favourite part of the codebase and I barely touched it, but it’s again something that can reduce the need for a bunch of hacks and also make adding new animations much easier to understand and implement. It definitely won’t be done by me though!
9. Is there any organizational or financial support on your wishlist? Something else you consider still missing or worth improving?
Striving to get the CII Best Practices badges helped shine some light on the weak areas of our project. This work is now done and there’s not much room to meaningfully improve further until we grow enough or change significantly. It includes things like license assignment (CLA) that are just off-putting, but that’s also the only thing that comes to mind where organizational support would be required (eg. from the Software Freedom Conservancy).
One obvious thing that should always be worked on is getting more people on board and increasing the bus factor. In a technical sense, recruiting someone strong in graphics programming would really help for our next release and making the SDL backends the best they can be. Our mobile ports have bitrotten, so until someone that cares enough comes along, they will remain unusable.
Project communication is also something that can always be improved; both external and internal. How to get more people to notice our news, is syndication (planets) still a thing, should we consider social media etc. For internal communications we have enough channels, but some contributors don’t use them, so most of the discussion is done on the tracker. That’s not inherently bad, but it’s also not ideal, since it’s drier and less realtime, meaning it’s easier to get misunderstood and worked up.
As for financial support, we’ve always redirected donations and never sought them, since there’s no obvious cost involved. I don’t think anyone ever considered trying to make a partial living out of it (as someone did with OpenMW IIRC), setting up bounties or just hoarding it. It could be used if we ever wanted to have an in-person hackathon or to cover costs for some other event like FOSDEM, but like I said, nobody ever bothered and the motivation comes from elsewhere.
10. How much time do you currently spend on GemRB for contributing? Per week or month, or generally.
It varies with time, work stress and motivation. At minimum I check the Gibberlings3 forums almost every day, to see if anyone needs help, any new discoveries have been made or if anything else interesting happened. Similarly with email to see the latest chatter on the issue tracker, review code changes and triage bugs.
Sometimes things just align and I fall into the Zone, deep hack mode or however you want to call it. Then time just disappears, a whole day is gone without noticing, and while a lot is achieved, I have to remind myself of the loading hint from BG2: While your character does not have to eat, remember that YOU do. We don’t want to lose any dedicated players.
11. Any final thoughts about IE games and GemRB 20 years later?
From the onset it has been a gargantuan task, so I’m immensely grateful to everyone that has contributed to GemRB over its history, making it as good as it is today. Our work is not finished, but this sort of thing is like an ultramarathon — for most of the run the goal is not within reach.
Companies come and go, but FLOSS persists and GemRB is even archived in GitHub’s Arctic code vault, ensuring our beloved games will be able to be played for decades to come. Come and help us continue our run!